# Another issue with history version

**URL:** <https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/another-issue-with-history-version/30971>\
**Category:** Modeling Questions\
**Created:** [March 24, 2024, 10:03pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/another-issue-with-history-version/30971 "2024-03-24T22:03:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johngerard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90db22/32.png) [@Johngerard](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Johngerard)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2024, 10:03pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/another-issue-with-history-version/30971/1 "2024-03-24T22:03:38Z")

</div>

What I love about the non-history version of Shapr3d is that I can drag select a series of objects. Then goto Layers. Tap and hold on any object that is high lighted and select group items. I can not do this in the History version.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johngerard](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/90db22/32.png) [@Johngerard](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Johngerard)\
**Post date:** [March 24, 2024, 10:11pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/another-issue-with-history-version/30971/2 "2024-03-24T22:11:14Z")

</div>

The issue is if I drag select items I can’t group them when going to Layers. If I select the items by clicking on the items one at a time then I get the full options list when I tap and hold an item in Layers. If I drag select items and then tap and hold any one of the selected items in Layers all I get is the item “Zoom To”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Gy](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.shapr3d.com/peter_gy/32/9251_2.png) [@Peter\_Gy](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Peter_Gy)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2024, 9:00am UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/another-issue-with-history-version/30971/3 "2024-03-25T09:00:04Z")

</div>

Could you please record a short video of this issue? I don’t seem to be able to reproduce it, the parametric beta works exactly like the non-parametric version in this regard for me.