# Technical Drawings based on ISO 22081:2021

**URL:** <https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131>\
**Category:** Feature requests\
**Created:** [November 30, 2023, 12:48pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131 "2023-11-30T12:48:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![keksboy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/f6c823/32.png) [@keksboy](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/keksboy)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2023, 12:48pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/1 "2023-11-30T12:48:51Z")

</div>

I would love to see a better TD Workspace where i can use ISO 22081:2021 to use this standard to fit my costumers needs. Implementing this would have a really big Impact on the Shapr.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alexander\_P](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.shapr3d.com/alexander_p/32/9694_2.png) [@Alexander\_P](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Alexander_P)\
**Post date:** [November 30, 2023, 1:29pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/2 "2023-11-30T13:29:23Z")

</div>

Hi Kilian,

Thanks for reaching out. This is one of the projects on top of our minds regarding drawings, supporting different standards better.

Are there any other standards that you are using or your customers require you to follow?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NathanD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/dec6dc/32.png) [@NathanD](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/NathanD)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2023, 5:50pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/3 "2023-12-04T17:50:49Z")

</div>

Hey @Alexander_P  
I wanted to chime in.  
In our case we use ASME Y14.5

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alexander\_P](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/discourse.shapr3d.com/alexander_p/32/9694_2.png) [@Alexander\_P](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Alexander_P)\
**Post date:** [December 4, 2023, 8:19pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/4 "2023-12-04T20:19:19Z")

</div>

Hi Nathan,

Thanks for jumping in, this is noted as well. Are there other standards (not necessarily connected to tolerancing) that are important for you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![NathanD](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/dec6dc/32.png) [@NathanD](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/NathanD)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2023, 4:22am UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/5 "2023-12-05T04:22:45Z")

</div>

ASME Y14.1-2020 I believe is sheet size standards for inch and metric sheets now. I believe the two were previously two separate standards.

This was from an online search, I’m not super knowledgeable of the standards just semi-familiar with them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dino12](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/9fc348/32.png) [@Dino12](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/u/Dino12)\
**Post date:** [December 5, 2023, 7:39pm UTC](https://discourse.shapr3d.com/t/technical-drawings-based-on-iso-22081-2021/29131/6 "2023-12-05T19:39:49Z")

</div>

It would be nice if we could just adjust the font size of the dimensions and text. If you make a 24"x36" drawing you can barely read the dimensions because they are so small. While your at it, let us change the color of the dimension text and lines to better differentiate between the two.