In the video you can see that geometries are lost when you change the order.
CAD Technically, this change in sequence should not cause any problems:
Greeting
PS: Unfortunately, as a new user, I cannot add the Shapr3D file.
Thank you Pascal, we’ll look into this, it is related to the previous issue that you reported.
1 Like
I have used a parametric driven cad software for many years and I think what users are seeing is that when you reorder a feature you might lose the reference that it was created from so you may have to go back and fix that reference so that the feature can be created correctly. This has always be a issue with pretty much all parametric driven cad software. But I can say that the Shapr3D team are going in the right direction by offering this with their software this will make them very completive.
Thank you
That doesn’t have to happen, there are many techniques how we can make reference handling more stable than legacy CAD systems. Actually this is one of the areas that will work significantly better in Shapr3D than in many other legacy systems.
1 Like
If changing the sequence doesn’t make sense, it’s not an error, it’s simply not possible and won’t be implemented.
However, if it makes sense (like the example above) it should work.
That’s why there is this beta test so that such things can be found.
Greeting
That’s sound great to me Istvan one of the big downfalls with working with legacy parametric Cad software is that there has always been issues dealing with feature references when changing models and if Shapr3D can figure out a way to deal with this issue it would be a major improvement.
Thank you
2 Likes